My experience of Mortal
Instruments: City of Bones began almost ideally. I knew nothing about it.
Hadn’t seen a trailer, hadn’t read a plot synopsis. I’d barely even seen a cast
list (and was – at first – pleasantly surprised to see Robert Sheehan from the
witty British show Misfits show up).
Friday, August 30, 2013
Dull Instruments
Sunday, August 25, 2013
Keep Your Eye on the Ball that Never Was
Films about magic walk a perilous line. These usually go
down one of two roads –they try to flummox the viewer by pretending to be a
magic trick in and of itself (thereby trying to gain some ‘art’ cred), or they
settle for being disposable, (hopefully) enjoyable ‘light’ options for the
weekend trip to the movies.
Now You See Me is
certainly fits into one of those categories. It’s unashamedly popcorn. It
becomes clear after the opening scene or two that Now You See Me will have nothing underneath the surface. The camera
swoops, swirls and dances. Pretty images of buildings and crowds are displayed
on the cinema wall. A series of sarcastic, fast-talking, smug characters are
introduced to us. They’re all excellent at fooling people. We catch on pretty
quick that this movie will be about them trying, in increasingly ‘wow!’ing
ways, fooling their hapless pursuant. It isn’t initially clear if this movie is
trying to go the route of the vastly superior The Prestige in trying to one-up us as viewers, but as long as the shiny swooping images of city skylines and attractive cast members continue,
we don’t much care.
The plot is stock-standard stuff for a studio heist/action
flick – a group of illusionists and mentalists are brought together by an unknown
figure. They are tasked with creating general mischief (stealing from banks,
draining the bank account of a well-known Evil One-Percenter) via a series of
glossy, slightly irritating magic shows. After they rob a French bank ‘during’
a show in Las Vegas (quotation marks very deliberate), police officer Dylan
Rhodes (Mark Ruffalo in full “archetypical surly cop” mode) and Interpol agent
Alma Drey (the luminous Melanie Laurent) pick up the case to nab these crooks.
They find it difficult to manage because the perps appear to genuinely have
magical powers etc etc.
Now You See Me has
a tendency to be irritating, although it should be said that large swathes of
the movie washed passed me harmlessly. As always with these movies, it’s fine
for its protagonists and the events surrounding them to be completely vacuous
and to fail to hold up to any kind of rational scrutiny – as long as the
characters are likable and/or interesting. They are neither. They have
irritating, contrived names like “J. Daniel Atlas” and “Merritt McKinney”. They
speak unnaturally, consistently sounding like lines from the trailer for the
movie they are in rather than real human beings.
Jesse Eisenberg takes the smug persona he invoked in The Social Network and ramps it up to
ten, while the script he is given drains the character of any complexity.
Morgan Freeman pops up in a bizarre, jarring role that only exists so that he
can explain what is happening in the movie in his deep, sombre baritone.
The film’s female characters are routinely humiliated and
degraded by the men around them. Their response seems to be to grovel more
deeply, fall in love more madly, and to accept their roles as the sidekicks. I
wouldn’t go so far as to say that Now You
See Me hates women, but it certainly doesn’t go out of its way to make them
as intelligent, crafty and resilient as their male counterparts. Then again, Now You See Me presents everyone in it
as a cardboard cut-out bereft of any real humanity, so best to go a little easy
on the misogyny accusations.
As it turns out, Now
You See Me is one of those magic
movies that tries to turn itself into a magic trick. The finale, the big
reveal, is… completely nonsensical.
Now You See Me is
'well shot' by director Louis Leterrier (who previously made the less-than-stupendous
Clash of the Titans, but also made
the benignly enjoyable Transporter
films). Meaning that, even if the characters aren’t worth a minute of our time and the plot
doesn’t add up, most of this film looks and sounds good technically. Some might say that’s reason
enough to venture out to see it – it looks good, and when no thought is
applied, even has a couple of satisfying twists and turns. But to concede that Now You See Me is a good movie is to
concede that you only like movies to watch nice images projected onto a
screen… and I can’t go for that.
Tuesday, August 20, 2013
A World a Little Too Much Like Ours
Elysium Directed by Neill Blomkamp Two Stars |
By Rollan Schott
The metaphors and allegory of Neill Blomkamp’s “Elysium” may
just as effectively be conveyed in summary. In 2154, the earth is
‘overpopulated’ and ‘polluted’, overrun by the ‘poor’ and ‘impoverished’, while
the ‘wealthy’ live on a Halo-style, Utopian space station just outside of our
atmosphere, still plainly visible to those on earth. They literally live
“above” the poor. A large underground market emerges to smuggle ‘undocumented’
citizens onto Elysium because of the quality of their ‘healthcare’, a
sophisticated scanning bed that diagnoses and heals every ailment (this
includes a man whose head is blown off by a grenade). This film is topical to
the point of madness. Imagine a large, cardboard picketing sign that reads
“Current Events!” rolled up tightly. Now imagine Blomkamp clubbing you with it
relentlessly for 109 minutes. Hollywood
liberalism is certainly not always noble.
Matt Damon in the lead role is Max, a citizen of earth who
lives in a dilapidated mortar shack and had survived for some time as a
formidable car thief. Now he works in a great manufacturing plant, building the
‘drones’ that serve as law enforcement officials both on Earth and Elysium,
furthering a developing trend in Hollywood wherein the unemployed must settle
for jobs developing the very harbinger of their inadequacy.
Following an accident at the plant involving radiation, Max
is given a precariously short time to live and resolves to make it to Elysium
for treatment at any cost. That’s effectively the entire story, which moves in
a cumbersome, lumbering way because Blomkamp has so little material and a
feature-length film to fill with it. Of course there is a girl, Frey (Alice
Braga), and Max’s forthright single-mindedness and avarice betray the change of
heart that will define the film’s climax. There are of course flashbacks,
fleeting images of clichéd adolescence that would have been right at home in a
Christopher Nolan movie.
At its heart, Elysium is an action movie, a prolonged,
violent chase between the righteous fugitive and the corrupt authority in an
unjust world. Having seen both his first feature, the intriguing but overrated
“District 9”, and now this, I feel that Mr. Blomkamp is not a sure handed
director. He struggles with tone. His presentation is inconsistent. In
“District 9” he attempted a kind of pseudo-documentary/news reel approach that
he elected to disregard when the action escalated.
The technique in “Elysium” is more conventional, but the
same problem persists. Blomkamp is at his best when there is something to
regard, rather than something with which he feels he must keep up. There seems
to be a bizarre corollary between the shakiness and general incomprehensibility
of the camera and the stakes of the action. An early shootout in an empty lot
is staged with a much better sense of place and movement than a climactic fight
in the bowels of a futuristic military compound on Elysium. Blomkamp is more
effective when his characters are in a place he can admire.
“Elysium” isn't the first movie ever made to use
conventional formula to serve an allegory. Hollywood made an art of the tactic during
the years of the Production Code. But Blomkamp is hanging his laurels on the
setup and not on the payoff. That’s why the back of the DVD cover will betray a
generic film with hollow ambitions. In the end, this film is aware of our
society’s shortcomings and expects that to be enough. The last twenty minutes
are spent waiting for “Elysium” to return to its topical roots. Blomkamp can’t
seem to tell you why he’s still swinging that rolled up sign.
Monday, August 5, 2013
The Lawless, Lackluster Limbo
R.I.P.D.
|
Apparently in an effort to cash in on the “Men in Black”
trend while it’s still fresh, Robert Schwentke’s “R.I.P.D.” employs the same
lawless universe afforded to an irresponsible filmmaker making a film about the
supernatural. “R.I.P.D” plays a bit like a Terry Gilliam film without the wit.
Everything is thrown at the wall. No opportunity for the outlandish or the
quirky is left on the table, usually at the expense of continuity or restraint.
When I am told that deceased police officers acting as purgatorial gateway
gunslingers must navigate the world of the living not as invisible phantoms but
as randomly assigned avatars like bodacious supermodels or crotchety old
Chinese men, I begin to suspect that the office in charge of rejecting bad
ideas had sat empty for a day or two. Or eight.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)